“There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, as an error which proceedeth from the ruler: Folly is set in great dignity, and the rich sit in low place. I have seen servants upon horses, and princes walking as servants upon the earth….Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a child, and thy princes eat in the morning! Blessed art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles, and thy princes eat in due season, for strength, and not for drunkenness! By much slothfulness the building decayeth; and through the idleness of the hands the house droppeth through.” Ecclesiastes 10: 5-7 & 16-18. KJV.
That is the story of Nigeria! The New International Version Bible says “…Fools are put in many high positions…Woe to you, O land whose king was a servant and whose princes feast in the morning. Blessed are you, O land whose king is of noble birth and whose princes eat at a proper time-for strength and not for drunkenness.” We do not understand that leadership is a calling and have elevated many who lack the nobility to serve and to lead into positions they are scarcely prepared for. For some time now I have reflected on this tragedy of our nation. There are some positions which are fundamental to a nation’s future-its leaders, teachers, doctors and healthcare workers, priests and judges. The more I reflected on these positions and their critical role in a nation’s destiny, the more it was clear to me that all of these positions are positions to which men are called.
The problem in Nigeria is that we have despised virtually all of them and elevated people into them with neither inner desire nor anointing for these offices. So many are promoted into priestly positions as routine postings and appointments; graduates who can’t get other positions become teachers a position they positively hate and visit their grievance and anger on their unfortunate students who embody our future; our medical workers are poorly treated and are always on strike, evidence that when they are not on strike, they do the work with disdain and unhappiness; and corruption has crept or perhaps strolled boldly into the honourable sanctuaries of justice. The price we pay for these evils under the sun of our nation is the state our nation is in today!
Of course the greatest error is in terms of those we have allowed to become leaders over us. Or in fact that might well be the foundational error i.e. perhaps the reason we are building dysfunctional education, administrative, judicial, medical and religious systems is because we have allowed misfits become our leaders. Our leaders have been servants, soldiers, customs officers, police officers, dishonourable men and women, cheats and fraudsters, thieves, street fighters and thugs. Essentially a coalition of all the wrong people lead while honourable people occupy lowly positions. When we see a gentleman who seeks leadership and/or who leads with consideration and humanness, we begin to despise him. Like the woman who prefers the man who ill treats her to one who respects and honours her, we are masochists who assume that only brigands and “chieftains” are good enough for leadership in Nigeria.
Unfortunately leadership is a calling and when servants rule, there is woe in the land, and the nation decays. When God would choose a first king for the Jews, he sent Samuel specifically to Saul and asked him to anoint him king over Israel. When God would replace Saul with David, he sent Samuel this time to the house of Jesse and told him to “Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man look on outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.” In Nigeria, worse than looking at the intimidating features of the chieftains we like as leaders, we look carefully at the size of their wallet and how free they are with its contents. In effect the more corrupt you are, or are perceived to be, the more your appeal in the politics of twenty-first century Nigeria!
As we step into 2011, we need to re-consider the qualifications for leadership in this country. We do not want scoundrels and men that lack integrity as our leaders. Why can’t that principled and honest school teacher be the local government councillor? Why can’t we encourage the kind doctor who established a hospital in the community and oftentimes treats poor people free-of-charge to be the local government chairman? Why can’t that virtuous lady who serves as usher in the church or mosque be a member of the House of Assembly? Why can’t the local Bar or Medical Association Chair or the Company Accountant be a federal legislator? What is wrong with the Dean or Professor in the University becoming a Senator? Why must we assume that these types are not “rough” enough to be leaders? Why can’t an intellectual or university lecturer be a President? Why must the servants ride on horses while noble men walk as servants?
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Innocent Blood at Easter
Human life is sacrosanct being created by God in his own image. Even animal life is not meant to be capriciously dispensed with, except to preserve or provide nourishment for humans or as a form of religious offering. Most cultures and religions venerate blood, even of animals. Native Yorubas may sacrifice the blood of a chicken or goat as religious propitiation. For elevated matters, they may use a cow, or seven cows! They may even use humans for weighty sacrifices such as when it involved an Oba or communal good! Most Nigerian, African and traditional religions acted similarly. In Islam, we are familiar with the account of Prophet Ibrahim, the Biblical Abraham and God’s instruction to sacrifice Isaac, but God replaced Isaac with a ram just in time. To this day, Moslems in imitation of Ibrahim offer a ram in probably the most important Islamic festival.
Amongst Jews, blood was similarly critical to religious observance, sacrifice, recompensing sin, trespass, or making peace offerings. In Biblical Israel, God instructed the Jews to mark their doorposts with blood of sacrificial lambs, so he could “pass over” them. Solomon’s fantastic offering of 1,000 bulls was a famous example of the power of such sacrifices in moving the hand of God. The Jews believed that “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission”. Thus the High Priest would enter the Tabernacle on the annual Day of Atonement, and offer a sacrifice to obtain mercy from God for Israel. If the High priest was himself unclean, he would sometimes die in the Holy of Holies! The Israelites were of course certain to sin again and the annual atonement would become a hollow ritual. The essence of the death and resurrection of Christ was God’s purpose to create an eternal and enduring sacrifice for mankind. Given the scale of the mission, only the blood of his own son, Jesus would do!
Unfortunately this Easter, the enduring memory would be the innocent lives needlessly shed in Northern Nigeria in the wake of President Jonathan’s victory in the April 16, 2011 presidential elections. At the very least, indirect (if not direct) responsibility for the carnage points towards General Muhammadu Buhari, Mr Tunde Bakare, members of their party the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and certain elements of the so-called Northern Political Leaders Forum (NPLF). On September 17, 2010, Adamu Ciroma threatened “a series of events, the scope and magnitude of which we can neither proximate nor contain”; on October 5, 2010, Lawal Kaita threatened “to make the country ungovernable for President Jonathan or any other Southerner” elected president; on December 15, 2010, Atiku Abubakar warned of “violent change” and a certain Atiku Support Group added that “Boko Haram will be a child’s play compared with the action our members can take”.
Buhari and CPC campaigns were characterised by violence and riotous behaviour with drivers and passers-by compelled to chant “Sai Buhari”; Jonathan’s billboards were pulled down, his campaign office was destroyed in Gombe and he was pelted with stones in Nasarawa; Buhari issued a public instruction to his already volatile supporters to “lynch any body that tries to tinker with your votes” and his running-mate Tunde Bakare threatened a “wild, wild North” if their expected victory did not materialise. Early on polling day, Buhari complained of rigging and aeroplanes carrying thumb-printed ballot papers even before most voters had voted, and his party made allegations of computer fraud and rigging once results not favouring the party began to emerge. Interestingly so far, the only established “systematic rigging” of the presidential election has been intimidation of electoral officers and pervasive under-aged voting in Northern Nigeria, mostly for the CPC candidate.
The “dying declaration” of youth corper Ikechukwu Ukeoma on Facebook, subsequently murdered in Bauchi, who declared “This CPC supporters would have killed me yesterday…Even after forcing under-aged voters on me, they wanted me to give them the remaining ballot papers to thumbprint. Thank God for the Police…” and CNN and local media evidence of child voting across the North is indisputable.
In the event, the calls for violence and “lynching” were obeyed in Bauchi, Gombe, Kano, Kaduna, Yola, Sokoto, Minna and elsewhere in Northern Nigeria as CPC supporters shouting support for Buhari burnt Churches, homes of PDP supporters and killed Southerners and Youth Corpers, in what are arguably crimes against humanity! It does seem that the orchestrated violence was designed for political purposes-to dissuade INEC and Government from announcing the rest of the results (as demanded by CPC Chairman Tony Momoh) as victory tilted irrevocably towards Jonathan; to force a political stalemate; or precipitate a national crisis that would have rendered the elections redundant! Whatever political calculations, the outcome is that innocent blood has been shed. It is particularly noteworthy that Bakare, who claims a Christian ministry, may be deemed complicit in the burning of Churches and killings of Christians!
Perhaps innocent blood has been shed in sacrifice for a new Nigeria? Perhaps President Jonathan and/or the international community will ensure that this time innocent blood is not shed in vain? Perhaps there would be truth, accountability and justice concerning responsibility for these needless deaths? What is certain is that God will demand an account of the blood of his children! May their souls rest in peace!!! Amen.
Amongst Jews, blood was similarly critical to religious observance, sacrifice, recompensing sin, trespass, or making peace offerings. In Biblical Israel, God instructed the Jews to mark their doorposts with blood of sacrificial lambs, so he could “pass over” them. Solomon’s fantastic offering of 1,000 bulls was a famous example of the power of such sacrifices in moving the hand of God. The Jews believed that “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission”. Thus the High Priest would enter the Tabernacle on the annual Day of Atonement, and offer a sacrifice to obtain mercy from God for Israel. If the High priest was himself unclean, he would sometimes die in the Holy of Holies! The Israelites were of course certain to sin again and the annual atonement would become a hollow ritual. The essence of the death and resurrection of Christ was God’s purpose to create an eternal and enduring sacrifice for mankind. Given the scale of the mission, only the blood of his own son, Jesus would do!
Unfortunately this Easter, the enduring memory would be the innocent lives needlessly shed in Northern Nigeria in the wake of President Jonathan’s victory in the April 16, 2011 presidential elections. At the very least, indirect (if not direct) responsibility for the carnage points towards General Muhammadu Buhari, Mr Tunde Bakare, members of their party the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and certain elements of the so-called Northern Political Leaders Forum (NPLF). On September 17, 2010, Adamu Ciroma threatened “a series of events, the scope and magnitude of which we can neither proximate nor contain”; on October 5, 2010, Lawal Kaita threatened “to make the country ungovernable for President Jonathan or any other Southerner” elected president; on December 15, 2010, Atiku Abubakar warned of “violent change” and a certain Atiku Support Group added that “Boko Haram will be a child’s play compared with the action our members can take”.
Buhari and CPC campaigns were characterised by violence and riotous behaviour with drivers and passers-by compelled to chant “Sai Buhari”; Jonathan’s billboards were pulled down, his campaign office was destroyed in Gombe and he was pelted with stones in Nasarawa; Buhari issued a public instruction to his already volatile supporters to “lynch any body that tries to tinker with your votes” and his running-mate Tunde Bakare threatened a “wild, wild North” if their expected victory did not materialise. Early on polling day, Buhari complained of rigging and aeroplanes carrying thumb-printed ballot papers even before most voters had voted, and his party made allegations of computer fraud and rigging once results not favouring the party began to emerge. Interestingly so far, the only established “systematic rigging” of the presidential election has been intimidation of electoral officers and pervasive under-aged voting in Northern Nigeria, mostly for the CPC candidate.
The “dying declaration” of youth corper Ikechukwu Ukeoma on Facebook, subsequently murdered in Bauchi, who declared “This CPC supporters would have killed me yesterday…Even after forcing under-aged voters on me, they wanted me to give them the remaining ballot papers to thumbprint. Thank God for the Police…” and CNN and local media evidence of child voting across the North is indisputable.
In the event, the calls for violence and “lynching” were obeyed in Bauchi, Gombe, Kano, Kaduna, Yola, Sokoto, Minna and elsewhere in Northern Nigeria as CPC supporters shouting support for Buhari burnt Churches, homes of PDP supporters and killed Southerners and Youth Corpers, in what are arguably crimes against humanity! It does seem that the orchestrated violence was designed for political purposes-to dissuade INEC and Government from announcing the rest of the results (as demanded by CPC Chairman Tony Momoh) as victory tilted irrevocably towards Jonathan; to force a political stalemate; or precipitate a national crisis that would have rendered the elections redundant! Whatever political calculations, the outcome is that innocent blood has been shed. It is particularly noteworthy that Bakare, who claims a Christian ministry, may be deemed complicit in the burning of Churches and killings of Christians!
Perhaps innocent blood has been shed in sacrifice for a new Nigeria? Perhaps President Jonathan and/or the international community will ensure that this time innocent blood is not shed in vain? Perhaps there would be truth, accountability and justice concerning responsibility for these needless deaths? What is certain is that God will demand an account of the blood of his children! May their souls rest in peace!!! Amen.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
The Leadership Calling
“There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, as an error which proceedeth from the ruler: Folly is set in great dignity, and the rich sit in low place. I have seen servants upon horses, and princes walking as servants upon the earth….Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a child, and thy princes eat in the morning! Blessed art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles, and thy princes eat in due season, for strength, and not for drunkenness! By much slothfulness the building decayeth; and through the idleness of the hands the house droppeth through.” Ecclesiastes 10: 5-7 & 16-18. KJV.
That is the story of Nigeria! The New International Version Bible says “…Fools are put in many high positions…Woe to you, O land whose king was a servant and whose princes feast in the morning. Blessed are you, O land whose king is of noble birth and whose princes eat at a proper time-for strength and not for drunkenness.” We do not understand that leadership is a calling and have elevated many who lack the nobility to serve and to lead into positions they are scarcely prepared for. For some time now I have reflected on this tragedy of our nation. There are some positions which are fundamental to a nation’s future-its leaders, teachers, doctors and healthcare workers, priests and judges. The more I reflected on these positions and their critical role in a nation’s destiny, the more it was clear to me that all of these positions are positions to which men are called.
The problem in Nigeria is that we have despised virtually all of them and elevated people into them with neither inner desire nor anointing for these offices. So many are promoted into priestly positions as routine postings and appointments; graduates who can’t get other positions become teachers a position they positively hate and visit their grievance and anger on their unfortunate students who embody our future; our medical workers are poorly treated and are always on strike, evidence that when they are not on strike, they do the work with disdain and unhappiness; and corruption has crept or perhaps strolled boldly into the honourable sanctuaries of justice. The price we pay for these evils under the sun of our nation is the state our nation is in today!
Of course the greatest error is in terms of those we have allowed to become leaders over us. Or in fact that might well be the foundational error i.e. perhaps the reason we are building dysfunctional education, administrative, judicial, medical and religious systems is because we have allowed misfits become our leaders. Our leaders have been servants, soldiers, customs officers, police officers, dishonourable men and women, cheats and fraudsters, thieves, street fighters and thugs. Essentially a coalition of all the wrong people lead while honourable people occupy lowly positions. When we see a gentleman who seeks leadership and/or who leads with consideration and humanness, we begin to despise him. Like the woman who prefers the man who ill treats her to one who respects and honours her, we are masochists who assume that only brigands and “chieftains” are good enough for leadership in Nigeria.
Unfortunately leadership is a calling and when servants rule, there is woe in the land, and the nation decays. When God would choose a first king for the Jews, he sent Samuel specifically to Saul and asked him to anoint him king over Israel. When God would replace Saul with David, he sent Samuel this time to the house of Jesse and told him to “Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man look on outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.” In Nigeria, worse than looking at the intimidating features of the chieftains we like as leaders, we look carefully at the size of their wallet and how free they are with its contents. In effect the more corrupt you are, or are perceived to be, the more your appeal in the politics of twenty-first century Nigeria!
As we step into 2011, we need to re-consider the qualifications for leadership in this country. We do not want scoundrels and men that lack integrity as our leaders. Why can’t that principled and honest school teacher be the local government councillor? Why can’t we encourage the kind doctor who established a hospital in the community and oftentimes treats poor people free-of-charge to be the local government chairman? Why can’t that virtuous lady who serves as usher in the church or mosque be a member of the House of Assembly? Why can’t the local Bar or Medical Association Chair or the Company Accountant be a federal legislator? What is wrong with the Dean or Professor in the University becoming a Senator? Why must we assume that these types are not “rough” enough to be leaders? Why can’t an intellectual or university lecturer be a President? Why must the servants ride on horses while noble men walk as servants?
That is the story of Nigeria! The New International Version Bible says “…Fools are put in many high positions…Woe to you, O land whose king was a servant and whose princes feast in the morning. Blessed are you, O land whose king is of noble birth and whose princes eat at a proper time-for strength and not for drunkenness.” We do not understand that leadership is a calling and have elevated many who lack the nobility to serve and to lead into positions they are scarcely prepared for. For some time now I have reflected on this tragedy of our nation. There are some positions which are fundamental to a nation’s future-its leaders, teachers, doctors and healthcare workers, priests and judges. The more I reflected on these positions and their critical role in a nation’s destiny, the more it was clear to me that all of these positions are positions to which men are called.
The problem in Nigeria is that we have despised virtually all of them and elevated people into them with neither inner desire nor anointing for these offices. So many are promoted into priestly positions as routine postings and appointments; graduates who can’t get other positions become teachers a position they positively hate and visit their grievance and anger on their unfortunate students who embody our future; our medical workers are poorly treated and are always on strike, evidence that when they are not on strike, they do the work with disdain and unhappiness; and corruption has crept or perhaps strolled boldly into the honourable sanctuaries of justice. The price we pay for these evils under the sun of our nation is the state our nation is in today!
Of course the greatest error is in terms of those we have allowed to become leaders over us. Or in fact that might well be the foundational error i.e. perhaps the reason we are building dysfunctional education, administrative, judicial, medical and religious systems is because we have allowed misfits become our leaders. Our leaders have been servants, soldiers, customs officers, police officers, dishonourable men and women, cheats and fraudsters, thieves, street fighters and thugs. Essentially a coalition of all the wrong people lead while honourable people occupy lowly positions. When we see a gentleman who seeks leadership and/or who leads with consideration and humanness, we begin to despise him. Like the woman who prefers the man who ill treats her to one who respects and honours her, we are masochists who assume that only brigands and “chieftains” are good enough for leadership in Nigeria.
Unfortunately leadership is a calling and when servants rule, there is woe in the land, and the nation decays. When God would choose a first king for the Jews, he sent Samuel specifically to Saul and asked him to anoint him king over Israel. When God would replace Saul with David, he sent Samuel this time to the house of Jesse and told him to “Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man look on outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.” In Nigeria, worse than looking at the intimidating features of the chieftains we like as leaders, we look carefully at the size of their wallet and how free they are with its contents. In effect the more corrupt you are, or are perceived to be, the more your appeal in the politics of twenty-first century Nigeria!
As we step into 2011, we need to re-consider the qualifications for leadership in this country. We do not want scoundrels and men that lack integrity as our leaders. Why can’t that principled and honest school teacher be the local government councillor? Why can’t we encourage the kind doctor who established a hospital in the community and oftentimes treats poor people free-of-charge to be the local government chairman? Why can’t that virtuous lady who serves as usher in the church or mosque be a member of the House of Assembly? Why can’t the local Bar or Medical Association Chair or the Company Accountant be a federal legislator? What is wrong with the Dean or Professor in the University becoming a Senator? Why must we assume that these types are not “rough” enough to be leaders? Why can’t an intellectual or university lecturer be a President? Why must the servants ride on horses while noble men walk as servants?
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
The Church in Nigeria
Archbishop Peter J Akinola recently retired as Primate of the Anglican Church of Nigeria after a very eventful and evidently successful tenure. He was also Bishop of Abuja; Chairman of the Council of Anglican Provinces in Africa; Chairman of the “South-South Encounter” of the Anglican Communion and President of the Christian Association of Nigeria”. Bishop Akinola was most known worldwide for his opposition to the ordination of homosexuals within the Anglican Communion. In 2003, he led a revolt against the planned ordination of Jeffrey John and Gene Robinson as Bishops of Reading and New Hampshire respectively precipitating a crisis in the Communion when the US Episcopals proceeded with Gene Robinson’s ordination. He became leader of a newly formed Convocation of Anglicans in North America, Anglicans who preferred to join with Akinola and the African Bishops who were irrevocably opposed to the ordain these homosexuals in the face of the explicit condemnation of homosexuality in several parts of the Bible.
Many true Christians in Nigeria, including non-Anglicans (and this columnist) were justifiably proud of, and encouraged by the leadership and principled position taken by Akinola. TIME Magazine was also impressed and nominated the Bishop as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2006, recognising him in the category of leaders and revolutionaries. Bishop Akinola chose fidelity to the scriptures rather than bending to the will of the western Anglican Church, which appears to have lost its way. I have however wished that Bishop Akinola would devote the same zeal he put to work against homosexuality towards issues which plague the church and society in Nigeria such as witchcraft and occultism, polygamy, election rigging, poor governance and most importantly corruption!
It is clear that there is a spiritual dimension to the problems we face in Nigeria! We have heard of politicians many of whom profess Christianity who kill hunchbacks, pregnant women and engage in other forms of human sacrifice to secure victory in elections! How can anything good come out of the reign of such a person if he indeed gets elected into office? How can an office holder who “won” his election through violence and intimidation of his constituents leading to the death and maiming of several govern in a manner acceptable to God or even men? Corruption has subverted Nigerian society and the church appears complicit in this regard. No one asks where the funds donated at Church events by political office holders, civil servants and even bankers come from. We shout “Praise the Lord…The Lord is good”, receive the fruits of corruption into the house of God (and thus defile the temple of God) and pray that God will replenish the (corrupt) source from which the resources came. Incidents of corruption, whether in banks or publicly-quoted companies, involve Christians, regrettably especially of the Pentecostal variety. When there is talk about an abuse of import duty waivers, the Church is implicated. When Ministers are accused of padding budgets, Christians are well-represented. In contemporary Nigerian Christianity, there seems to be no conflict between corruption and our faith!
An Anglican in the US or UK may scoff at our Bishops’ fervent denunciation of homosexuality and wonder why their voices are not heard in respect of many of these social problems bedevilling our own society and militating against the physical and spiritual well-being of our people. Fortunately towards the end of his tenure, Bishop Akinola began to speak strongly and powerfully against corruption, which is more than we can say about many of his ecclesiastical colleagues. At one event, where virtually the entire national political leadership elite were present, the Bishop railed and cursed those involved in corruption, much like Jesus Christ would have done against the Pharisees. Some others in the Church are also beginning to confront these issues and seeking to reclaim the credibility of the Church. Otherwise on-lookers would assume the Church is silent because it is compromised. Recently at the ceremony at which Bishop Akinola’s successor, Nicholas Okoh was installed as Primate, Acting President Goodluck Jonathan challenged the Church on such matters. He recounted an incident in which some crime was committed by an individual and the fellow’s church members immediately rallied to bail him out. Jonathan wondered whether the church had any moral duty to examine the allegations against the “brother” before the church got itself involved in the matter.
I have written before that the purpose of the Church is not to be conformed to the world, but to be the light or salt of the earth. That transformational role of the Church is not being fulfilled in our times. This Easter, as we reflect on the life of Christ who transformed mankind in his short mortal existence, perhaps we should seek to reclaim that mandate for societal transformation. Happy Easter!
Many true Christians in Nigeria, including non-Anglicans (and this columnist) were justifiably proud of, and encouraged by the leadership and principled position taken by Akinola. TIME Magazine was also impressed and nominated the Bishop as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2006, recognising him in the category of leaders and revolutionaries. Bishop Akinola chose fidelity to the scriptures rather than bending to the will of the western Anglican Church, which appears to have lost its way. I have however wished that Bishop Akinola would devote the same zeal he put to work against homosexuality towards issues which plague the church and society in Nigeria such as witchcraft and occultism, polygamy, election rigging, poor governance and most importantly corruption!
It is clear that there is a spiritual dimension to the problems we face in Nigeria! We have heard of politicians many of whom profess Christianity who kill hunchbacks, pregnant women and engage in other forms of human sacrifice to secure victory in elections! How can anything good come out of the reign of such a person if he indeed gets elected into office? How can an office holder who “won” his election through violence and intimidation of his constituents leading to the death and maiming of several govern in a manner acceptable to God or even men? Corruption has subverted Nigerian society and the church appears complicit in this regard. No one asks where the funds donated at Church events by political office holders, civil servants and even bankers come from. We shout “Praise the Lord…The Lord is good”, receive the fruits of corruption into the house of God (and thus defile the temple of God) and pray that God will replenish the (corrupt) source from which the resources came. Incidents of corruption, whether in banks or publicly-quoted companies, involve Christians, regrettably especially of the Pentecostal variety. When there is talk about an abuse of import duty waivers, the Church is implicated. When Ministers are accused of padding budgets, Christians are well-represented. In contemporary Nigerian Christianity, there seems to be no conflict between corruption and our faith!
An Anglican in the US or UK may scoff at our Bishops’ fervent denunciation of homosexuality and wonder why their voices are not heard in respect of many of these social problems bedevilling our own society and militating against the physical and spiritual well-being of our people. Fortunately towards the end of his tenure, Bishop Akinola began to speak strongly and powerfully against corruption, which is more than we can say about many of his ecclesiastical colleagues. At one event, where virtually the entire national political leadership elite were present, the Bishop railed and cursed those involved in corruption, much like Jesus Christ would have done against the Pharisees. Some others in the Church are also beginning to confront these issues and seeking to reclaim the credibility of the Church. Otherwise on-lookers would assume the Church is silent because it is compromised. Recently at the ceremony at which Bishop Akinola’s successor, Nicholas Okoh was installed as Primate, Acting President Goodluck Jonathan challenged the Church on such matters. He recounted an incident in which some crime was committed by an individual and the fellow’s church members immediately rallied to bail him out. Jonathan wondered whether the church had any moral duty to examine the allegations against the “brother” before the church got itself involved in the matter.
I have written before that the purpose of the Church is not to be conformed to the world, but to be the light or salt of the earth. That transformational role of the Church is not being fulfilled in our times. This Easter, as we reflect on the life of Christ who transformed mankind in his short mortal existence, perhaps we should seek to reclaim that mandate for societal transformation. Happy Easter!
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Princess Diana or Hillary Clinton?
Everyone is familiar with the Biblical story of Adam and Eve. Genesis 1: 27-28 says “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea…” birds, and every living thing God in effect giving man a mission statement. We know specifically that God first created man, and then seeing that “…It is not good that the man should be alone…”, God proceeded to make a “help meet” for him (Genesis 2). Implicit in this we see that God created woman for COMPANIONSHIP AND HELP OR SUPPORT for man. In Genesis 2: 21-25, we know that God created Eve out of the rib he took from Adam after he had “caused a deep sleep to fall upon him” implying again that only in woman is man COMPLETE.
They were as Adam declared “bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh…and they shall be one flesh…And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” again suggesting the INTIMACY, SEXUAL AND EMOTIONAL UNION and SOLIDARITY that God intended between man and woman. These verses also suggest than man would be a COVERING for woman and vice versa and that in each other would their DESTINIES be fulfilled. I would not bother recounting the story of man’s fall recounted in Genesis 3, as that is not the focus of this write-up. Suffice to note that both man and woman failed this first and critical spiritual test. The story however reminds us that the enemy will always seek to penetrate the relationship between man and woman through the more vulnerable or naïve of the two.
After the fall Adam and Eve continued their (now) mortal existence outside the garden of Eden, and the indirect Biblical evidence is that Eve for the rest of her relationship with Adam succeeded in her multiple roles-conception, co-habitation, comfort, help, completeness, covering and consummation of destiny enabling Adam to live to a ripe old age of 930 years (Genesis 5:5). There are other Biblical stories that till this day provide insight into the possibilities of relationships between man and woman. Sarah and Abraham-proceeding from an initial error (giving Hagar, her servant to Abraham as wife, but eventually fulfilling the vision (Genesis 21:5). In the story of David and Bathsheba (and Uriah) (2 Samuel 11-12), we see how adultery, lying, oppression and eventually murder can result from complex relationships between men and women. From Uriah’s point of view, we also see how a man can lose his life because of a cheating lover.
The story of Samson and Delilah (Judges 16) also contains eternal wisdom. Samson’s only weakness was his love for women, and his enemies, the Philistines, having failed in every other stratagem, successfully penetrated Samson’s household by getting Delilah to seek out and reveal his secrets to his enemies. It is interesting that in spite of several previous attempts which revealed Delilah’s evil intent (verses 7-9; 10-12; and 13-14), Samson eventually (verse 17) revealed his strength to her, and through her to his enemies, reminding us that a woman would always have the ability to destroy her lover, and sometimes vice versa. What does all this have to do with Princess Diana or Hillary Clinton? Both were famous women, married to very important men, and known all over the world. But they were very different in important ways, and with severely divergent consequences.
Diana was the young, pretty and adorable bride of Prince Charles, at the time probably the most eligible bachelor in the world. She was not highly educated, but had an appearance of innocence that the world loved. She was however, as it later emerged not very wise, even though highly manipulative. When she experienced problems in her marriage, she appears to have turned to other men and eventually was divorced from her husband. Her lovers included Asian cricketers, doctors and eventually an Egyptian Moslem, Dodi El-Fayed with whom she died in a tragic car accident in Paris. Hillary Clinton on the other hand was married to Bill Clinton. Both Bill and Hillary were brilliant lawyers, and when Bill became Governor of Arkansas, she continued in private legal practice. Eventually with Hillary’s strong support and encouragement, Bill became President of America and Hillary the First Lady. The Monica Lewinsky scandal almost destroyed Clinton and Hillary held Bill Clinton’s destiny in her hand. If she turned against him, his Presidency was likely to be irredeemably damaged. Fortunately Hillary saw the bigger picture. She decided to fight the “vast right wing conspiracy” that sought to destroy her husband, and even though she was mad at Bill, she understood that their destinies, not just his, were at stake.
While Diana lies dead in her grave, her husband has married Camilla his long time lover, and may yet become King of England. Hillary on the other hand, became Senator from New York, almost became Democratic Presidential Candidate, losing very narrowly to Barack Obama, and is now US Secretary of State. While Hillary understood her God-given role, to help her husband fulfil his destiny and therein fulfil hers as well, Diana did not and trifled with it. She did not understand her great and historical role, as Princess, Queen, Queen Mother and in the Church of England.
They were as Adam declared “bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh…and they shall be one flesh…And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” again suggesting the INTIMACY, SEXUAL AND EMOTIONAL UNION and SOLIDARITY that God intended between man and woman. These verses also suggest than man would be a COVERING for woman and vice versa and that in each other would their DESTINIES be fulfilled. I would not bother recounting the story of man’s fall recounted in Genesis 3, as that is not the focus of this write-up. Suffice to note that both man and woman failed this first and critical spiritual test. The story however reminds us that the enemy will always seek to penetrate the relationship between man and woman through the more vulnerable or naïve of the two.
After the fall Adam and Eve continued their (now) mortal existence outside the garden of Eden, and the indirect Biblical evidence is that Eve for the rest of her relationship with Adam succeeded in her multiple roles-conception, co-habitation, comfort, help, completeness, covering and consummation of destiny enabling Adam to live to a ripe old age of 930 years (Genesis 5:5). There are other Biblical stories that till this day provide insight into the possibilities of relationships between man and woman. Sarah and Abraham-proceeding from an initial error (giving Hagar, her servant to Abraham as wife, but eventually fulfilling the vision (Genesis 21:5). In the story of David and Bathsheba (and Uriah) (2 Samuel 11-12), we see how adultery, lying, oppression and eventually murder can result from complex relationships between men and women. From Uriah’s point of view, we also see how a man can lose his life because of a cheating lover.
The story of Samson and Delilah (Judges 16) also contains eternal wisdom. Samson’s only weakness was his love for women, and his enemies, the Philistines, having failed in every other stratagem, successfully penetrated Samson’s household by getting Delilah to seek out and reveal his secrets to his enemies. It is interesting that in spite of several previous attempts which revealed Delilah’s evil intent (verses 7-9; 10-12; and 13-14), Samson eventually (verse 17) revealed his strength to her, and through her to his enemies, reminding us that a woman would always have the ability to destroy her lover, and sometimes vice versa. What does all this have to do with Princess Diana or Hillary Clinton? Both were famous women, married to very important men, and known all over the world. But they were very different in important ways, and with severely divergent consequences.
Diana was the young, pretty and adorable bride of Prince Charles, at the time probably the most eligible bachelor in the world. She was not highly educated, but had an appearance of innocence that the world loved. She was however, as it later emerged not very wise, even though highly manipulative. When she experienced problems in her marriage, she appears to have turned to other men and eventually was divorced from her husband. Her lovers included Asian cricketers, doctors and eventually an Egyptian Moslem, Dodi El-Fayed with whom she died in a tragic car accident in Paris. Hillary Clinton on the other hand was married to Bill Clinton. Both Bill and Hillary were brilliant lawyers, and when Bill became Governor of Arkansas, she continued in private legal practice. Eventually with Hillary’s strong support and encouragement, Bill became President of America and Hillary the First Lady. The Monica Lewinsky scandal almost destroyed Clinton and Hillary held Bill Clinton’s destiny in her hand. If she turned against him, his Presidency was likely to be irredeemably damaged. Fortunately Hillary saw the bigger picture. She decided to fight the “vast right wing conspiracy” that sought to destroy her husband, and even though she was mad at Bill, she understood that their destinies, not just his, were at stake.
While Diana lies dead in her grave, her husband has married Camilla his long time lover, and may yet become King of England. Hillary on the other hand, became Senator from New York, almost became Democratic Presidential Candidate, losing very narrowly to Barack Obama, and is now US Secretary of State. While Hillary understood her God-given role, to help her husband fulfil his destiny and therein fulfil hers as well, Diana did not and trifled with it. She did not understand her great and historical role, as Princess, Queen, Queen Mother and in the Church of England.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Christianity and Society: Human Rights and Justice
Introduction
It is my pleasure to be a guest of Christ Baptist Church, Gbagada, Lagos. My Curriculum Vitae does not reveal a few things about me that may be of interest to you. For instance it does not say that I was baptised in a Baptist Church, specifically Shepherdhill Baptist Church, Obanikoro not too far from this location. It also does not reveal that my wife and her entire family including her grand parents were life long Baptists, nor does it indicate that my father-in-law and late grand father-in-law were both Baptist ministers. You can therefore understand when I say that I feel very comfortable in your midst. An additional reason for my relative ease is the fact that my good friend Mr Lowo Adesola, whose ordination as a Deacon I attended some years ago, is also one of your members.
The topic I have been asked to discuss, “Christianity and Society: Human Rights and Justice” is one I am very interested in. As a Christian, Lawyer, Consultant, Newspaper Columnist and Frequent Public Commentator, those are matters which should concern me. As someone who sometimes or indeed oftentimes worries about whether the Church in Nigeria is optimising its role and potential in terms of helping to build a just and progressive society, I am pleased that Christ Baptist Church considers this topic one that is worthy of examination. I commend your commitment to the building of a Church and Society shaped by the best Christian values, a commitment which I am sure must have informed the selection of this topic. I greet the Pastor, Ayo Gbode and the leadership and congregation and pray that the grace and favour of God will continue to abide in your Church, Homes and Businesses.
The Foundation and Source of Law
Anyone who has read the Bible with readily agree with the assertion that the first law was that given to Adam (and Eve) in the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 2: 16-17, the Bible records that “And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” What is law other than a proclamation by a sovereign prescribing acceptable behaviour (e.g. payment of taxes) or proscribing unacceptable conduct (do not drive against traffic) and including a sanction for breach or non-compliance (fine, imprisonment or both). In that verse, God essentially laid out the original law-you may eat of every other tree except that of the knowledge of good and evil. If you disobey, you will suffer spiritual death! Of course we know the rest of the story. It is in the nature of men to break the law, and that is why we are here today. And it is in the nature of law breakers till this day to seek to hide or escape from the long (or in our society, often short) arms of the law. Men learnt it from their forbears, Adam and Eve who after sinning against God sought to hide themselves from him (Genesis 3: 8).
The first tentative steps towards the creation of a legal system was taken also in Genesis, in chapter 9:6 where God specifically prohibited murder and stipulated the death penalty therefore-“Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed…”. It was necessary for God to make this explicit prohibition after Cain killed Abel, because until then God was yet to prescribe a specific punishment for murder. Perhaps that is why God only cursed rather than killed Cain, thus laying down a legal principle that endures to this day-laws must be specifically enacted and published and the law must stipulate the punishment for breach.
The basic foundations of a comprehensive legal system were however outlined in Exodus 20 when God pronounced the “ten commandments” which we remember as follows:-
• Against Polytheism (No other Gods)
• Against Idolatry (No Graven Images)
• Against False Oaths (Swearing in Vain)
• Honouring the Sabbath (Resting on the Seventh Day)
• Honouring Father and Mother (That your days may be Long)
• Against Murder (Thou shalt not kill)
• Against Adultery (Thou shalt not commit adultery)
• Against Theft (Thou shalt not steal)
• Against Perjury (Bearing False Witness)
• Against Covetousness (Of Neighbour’s House, Wife, Manservant, Maidservant, Ox, Ass, etc)
Most of these principles and laws endure in one form or the other in our criminal, civil, matrimonial, labour and evidence laws even till this day. False oaths and perjury are both crimes and affect the weight or admissibility of evidence; Murder and theft are crimes all over the world; while adultery is not a crime in common law countries, it is a ground for divorce under our Matrimonial Causes Act and may weigh against the “guilty” party in the consequential orders made by a family judge; the law punishes obtaining by false pretences, conversion etc which are a result of covetousness; labour laws still requires a day of rest etc.
Of course the Bible goes beyond these “civil” laws into other spiritual laws such as in Genesis 31: 12-17 relating to the Sabbath; Genesis 34: 12-16 on laws of conquest; Genesis 34: 21-26 on the Sabbath, feasts, first fruits etc. The book of Leviticus was a continuation of Moses “lawgiving” in Genesis and Exodus. Detailed laws concerning sacrifice, offerings, consecration and priesthood, building of the tabernacle, and worship were included in the book. Even though the Book of Numbers centred primarily on the two great numberings (censuses) of the children of Israel, it also prescribes various laws for Israel (in Chapters 6, 15, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35 and 36). In Deuteronomy, Moses repeats the Ten Commandments (Chapter 5) and includes many new laws. And of course Christ himself reminds us in the New Testament (Mathew 5: 17-18) that he came not to abolish, but to fulfil the law.
The thesis I have been trying to demonstrate above must now be apparent-that God is the source and foundation of all law!
Biblical Influences on Contemporary Law
Beyond these fundamental foundations, we see the influence of the Bible all over the development of legal principles even till contemporary times. The laws relating to incest (Leviticus 18: 6-18); Homosexuality (Leviticus 18: 22); Bestiality (Leviticus 18: 23); Stealing, False Testimony and Obtaining by False Pretences-“419”(Leviticus 19: 11); False Oaths (Leviticus 19: 12); Labour Laws and Fraud (Leviticus 19: 13); Fair Hearing (Leviticus 19: 29); Prostitution (Leviticus 19: 29); Imposing Various Punishments (Leviticus 20); Equality before the Law (Leviticus 24: 22) and Judicial Retribution (Leviticus 24: 20).
We see the beginnings of the institution of the Judiciary in Exodus 18; 13 when Moses “sat to judge the people…” and 18: 14-26 when upon the advice of Jethro, his father-in-law, he “…chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people, …And they judged the people at all seasons: the hard causes they brought unto Moses…”, (in effect Moses was the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court), “…but every small matter they judged themselves…” (while the others were Magistrate and High Courts). See also Deuteronomy 16: 18 (“Judges and officers shalt thou make in all thy gates, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment”) and 17: 8-11. We also see the articulation of judicial principles which remain till today in Deuteronomy 16: 19-20, “Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. That which is altogether just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.” Every thing a modern day judge needs to know about fair hearing, perverting justice, judicial corruption, independence and fairness of the judiciary and judicial impartiality is contained in those verses.
In the book of Exodus we see other influences on the development of the laws of Tort/Negligence (21: 33-36 and 22: 6); Rape (22: 16-17); Sedition/Treason/Anarchy (22: 28) and Bribery (23: 18). In Deuteronomy, we see the origins of laws on the criminal burden of proof and corroboration in evidence (17: 6-7-“On the evidence of two or three witnesses he who is worthy of death shall be put to death; he shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness…”)
Again the thesis developed here must now be compelling-modern laws, legal and judicial principles and court systems have their roots in the laws of God, and their development has been overwhelmingly shaped by Christian doctrine.
Fundamental Human Rights in Nigeria
Chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria contains the fundamental human rights provisions that operate in Nigerian law. The fact that human rights are embedded in our supreme law, the Constitution means as proclaimed in Section 1 (1) that those provisions “…shall have binding force on all authorities and persons throughout the Federal Republic of Nigeria” and as stated in Section 1 (3), “if any other law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other law shall to the extent of the inconsistency be void”
The rights enshrined in our laws are outlined from Section 33:-
• Section 33-Right to Life
• Section 34-Dignity of the Human Person; Prohibition of Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment; Prohibition of Slavery or Servitude; Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labour
• Section 35-Right to Personal Liberty
• Section 36-Right to Fair Hearing
• Section 37-Right to Private and Family Life
• Section 38-Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion
• Section 39-Freedom of Expression
• Section 40-Right to Peaceful Assembly and Association
• Section 41-Freedom of Movement
• Section 42-Freedom from Discrimination on Grounds of Community, Ethnic Group, Place of Origin, Religion or Political Opinion
• Section 43-Right to Property
• Section 44-Protection against Compulsory Acquisition of Property without Compensation
What is the source or basis of these provisions? Given all that I have said to this point, it will not surprise you that in my view the notion that a man is created with some fundamental rights, freedoms and protections emanate from the fact of his creation by God, and in the image of God.
See Genesis 1: 26-30, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created created he him; male and female created he them….”
And Genesis 9: 6, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”
In John 10: 10 Christ himself proclaimed, “…I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”
In my view, whether the modern jurist recognises it or not, and irrespective of his acceptance or otherwise, or in spite of his (now secular) high learning and sophistication, these are the most fundamental origins of the notion that man, as man is entitled to some inalienable human rights. That is why Thomas Jefferson declared in the American Declaration of Independence that, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” famously quoted by Martin Luther King Jnr. John Locke also said in “Two Treatises of Civil Government” that “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of laws, where there is no law, there is no freedom”. The American State and its Constitution was without doubt founded upon assumptions about the divine source of laws and the American Currency not surprisingly declares, “In God We Trust”.
Perversion of Human Rights and Justice
If you accept the view that laws and human rights are founded in God’s law, then you will shudder at the perversion and destruction of these foundations and the deployment of legal principles against the ways of God that increasingly characterises modern societies. Some examples will suffice:-
• In Nigeria, persons accused of corruption have deployed fundamental human rights provisions and the protections of our laws and Constitution to avoid, delay and frustrate their prosecution under the law
• Those individuals accused of unleashing terror on and indeed killing some of their fellow men (Alex Ibru, Abraham Adesanya, Kudirat Abiola etc) have employed the instrumentalities of the legal system to avoid and delay justice
• The poor are oppressed by the police and the state, and by powerful individuals and the rich and powerful are in Nigeria essentially above the law
• In Western societies, the most important “human rights” today are the following:-
o Gay Rights-advancing and protecting homosexuality which the Bible calls Sodomy and God explicitly condemns
o Animal Rights-which may one day evolve into justifying bestiality, which God also condemns
o Environmental Protection-which is okay, but which is in danger of making man subject to the environment rather than the other way round (contrary to Genesis 2: 28)
o Same-Sex Marriages-In most Western societies, the trend is towards recognition of marriages or so-called civil unions between people of the same sex
o Gay Adoption Rights-the right of “gay” couples to adopt children
o Abortion Rights-the “Pro-Choice” argument that women can choose to terminate pregnancies at their own will
o Gun Rights-the right of men to bear arms (leading to mass killings and massacres)
• Indeed there is an increasing trend of reverse discrimination-a contestant in a US beauty contest was not selected as winner because she expressed the view that a marriage is a union of a man and woman; a nominee for the post of EU Commissioner was dropped because of his anti-gay views; many in the liberal wing of US politics opposed President Barack Obama’s choice of Pastor Rick Warren, of Saddleback Church and author of the popular, “The Purpose-Driven Life” to give the opening prayer at his inauguration because of his preaching against homosexuality. Today homosexuality is no longer on the defence, but on an aggressive offensive against “homophobia”
• In the Anglican Church, the Church is split on the issue of ordination of openly-homosexual persons as ministers
• In the US, prayer in public schools is illegal and often in many western societies, persons who express religious views are viewed almost in a manner similar to how we perceive insanity
• In California, arguments are now being made for the legalisation of marijuana, because the income that may be generated there from will help in balancing the state’s budget! Indeed my favourite news magazine “The Economist” recently argued in effect in favour of legalising drugs because it is cheaper so to do!! The Transaction-Cost Theory of economics is now applied to justify legalising drugs, prostitution, abortion and even assisted-suicide and euthanasia!!!
The law has lost or is losing its link with its source and foundation-God-and now becoming solely a technical, utilitarian and amoral code of conduct for regulating the affairs of men. Increasingly the law indeed goes beyond being amoral and often times looks positively immoral! Alas, the recent global financial crisis should remind us of the consequences when men act only on the basis of raw passions, in that case greed, recklessness and materialism of US and other Western bankers almost destroyed the global economy. One may add that the recent removal of the CEOs and Executive Directors of five of our banks also demonstrates the same point.
Christianity and Society
What is, or what should be the role of the Church in society? Mathew 5: 13 says, “Ye are the salt of the earth…” and Mathew 5:14-16 says, “Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven”. These scriptures are unambiguous. The Church as a body and individual believers are supposed to provide light in a world overcome by evil and dark behaviours. They are supposed to be the example for others, role models of propriety and righteousness. Where they are sanctioning banks or bankers, the world is supposed to notice that Christians are absent from the list. When corporate governance failures and scandals occur in publicly quoted companies, people should note that Christians CEOs and Directors behave differently. The electorate should be able to observe a difference between the behaviour of elected public office holders who profess the Christian faith and their non-Christian counterparts. University undergraduates should be comfortable that Christian lecturers do not engage in “sorting” or other malpractices that occur in our tertiary institutions. Christian lawyers, engineers, civil servants, teachers, doctors should be different. Pastors should be different! Is this our experience today? That is not my experience!
The Bible says in Mathew 6: 19-20 that we should “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also”. I dare say many of us find it difficult or perhaps impossible to believe this scripture. I do not think the Lord counsels poverty and want. He simply cares about what our fundamental priorities are, and where we will draw the line if we had to choose between heaven and earth. Again Romans 12: 2 urges us all, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God”. Finally as we all know, Mathew 7: 20 tells us that it is by our fruits that we shall be known.
Can we say like the early Church that the fruit of the contemporary Church is Love? Unity? Power? (Mathew 5: 43-46; Acts 1: 14; Acts 2: 1; Acts 4: 32-33) Are we good Samaritans? (Luke 10: 25-37) Are we like Christ, driven by compassion for the world and for our neighbours? (Mark 1: 41; Mark 6: 34; Mark 8: 2-3). Are we agents of societal transformation like the Puritans, Quakers and post-Protestant Reformation Christians transformed European values and conduct (e.g. the so-called Protestant Work Ethic), a transformation which arguably made the Industrial Revolution possible? Why is the Nigerian Church scarcely engaged with the major challenges of our nation-corruption, electoral malpractices, crime and violence, unaccountable leaders, poverty, oppression, insecurity, social injustice and abusive use of power? Why have these and other social issues not been at the top of the agenda of the contemporary Nigerian Church? Jesus Christ himself spoke out especially on behalf of the poor or weak, those who mourn, the meek, the sick, all those who labour and are heavy laden, widows, the lame, blind etc and he railed against oppression. Why are our Churches not having any significant impact on societal vices and values?
Conclusion
The Church must rediscover its essence. As our Lord Jesus Christ warns, “…but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.” (Mathew 5: 13) God forbid that this be the fate of the body of Christ or of any of us! Amen. Happily I can say of this assembly, from the little I have known and heard about you, that you are seeking to impact your society as our Lord commands. This programme is tangible evidence of that impact.
I wish you well and pray that the Lord will bless and multiply your efforts and continue to shine his light upon all of us. Amen.
Opeyemi Agbaje
Lagos, Nigeria.
2009
It is my pleasure to be a guest of Christ Baptist Church, Gbagada, Lagos. My Curriculum Vitae does not reveal a few things about me that may be of interest to you. For instance it does not say that I was baptised in a Baptist Church, specifically Shepherdhill Baptist Church, Obanikoro not too far from this location. It also does not reveal that my wife and her entire family including her grand parents were life long Baptists, nor does it indicate that my father-in-law and late grand father-in-law were both Baptist ministers. You can therefore understand when I say that I feel very comfortable in your midst. An additional reason for my relative ease is the fact that my good friend Mr Lowo Adesola, whose ordination as a Deacon I attended some years ago, is also one of your members.
The topic I have been asked to discuss, “Christianity and Society: Human Rights and Justice” is one I am very interested in. As a Christian, Lawyer, Consultant, Newspaper Columnist and Frequent Public Commentator, those are matters which should concern me. As someone who sometimes or indeed oftentimes worries about whether the Church in Nigeria is optimising its role and potential in terms of helping to build a just and progressive society, I am pleased that Christ Baptist Church considers this topic one that is worthy of examination. I commend your commitment to the building of a Church and Society shaped by the best Christian values, a commitment which I am sure must have informed the selection of this topic. I greet the Pastor, Ayo Gbode and the leadership and congregation and pray that the grace and favour of God will continue to abide in your Church, Homes and Businesses.
The Foundation and Source of Law
Anyone who has read the Bible with readily agree with the assertion that the first law was that given to Adam (and Eve) in the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 2: 16-17, the Bible records that “And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” What is law other than a proclamation by a sovereign prescribing acceptable behaviour (e.g. payment of taxes) or proscribing unacceptable conduct (do not drive against traffic) and including a sanction for breach or non-compliance (fine, imprisonment or both). In that verse, God essentially laid out the original law-you may eat of every other tree except that of the knowledge of good and evil. If you disobey, you will suffer spiritual death! Of course we know the rest of the story. It is in the nature of men to break the law, and that is why we are here today. And it is in the nature of law breakers till this day to seek to hide or escape from the long (or in our society, often short) arms of the law. Men learnt it from their forbears, Adam and Eve who after sinning against God sought to hide themselves from him (Genesis 3: 8).
The first tentative steps towards the creation of a legal system was taken also in Genesis, in chapter 9:6 where God specifically prohibited murder and stipulated the death penalty therefore-“Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed…”. It was necessary for God to make this explicit prohibition after Cain killed Abel, because until then God was yet to prescribe a specific punishment for murder. Perhaps that is why God only cursed rather than killed Cain, thus laying down a legal principle that endures to this day-laws must be specifically enacted and published and the law must stipulate the punishment for breach.
The basic foundations of a comprehensive legal system were however outlined in Exodus 20 when God pronounced the “ten commandments” which we remember as follows:-
• Against Polytheism (No other Gods)
• Against Idolatry (No Graven Images)
• Against False Oaths (Swearing in Vain)
• Honouring the Sabbath (Resting on the Seventh Day)
• Honouring Father and Mother (That your days may be Long)
• Against Murder (Thou shalt not kill)
• Against Adultery (Thou shalt not commit adultery)
• Against Theft (Thou shalt not steal)
• Against Perjury (Bearing False Witness)
• Against Covetousness (Of Neighbour’s House, Wife, Manservant, Maidservant, Ox, Ass, etc)
Most of these principles and laws endure in one form or the other in our criminal, civil, matrimonial, labour and evidence laws even till this day. False oaths and perjury are both crimes and affect the weight or admissibility of evidence; Murder and theft are crimes all over the world; while adultery is not a crime in common law countries, it is a ground for divorce under our Matrimonial Causes Act and may weigh against the “guilty” party in the consequential orders made by a family judge; the law punishes obtaining by false pretences, conversion etc which are a result of covetousness; labour laws still requires a day of rest etc.
Of course the Bible goes beyond these “civil” laws into other spiritual laws such as in Genesis 31: 12-17 relating to the Sabbath; Genesis 34: 12-16 on laws of conquest; Genesis 34: 21-26 on the Sabbath, feasts, first fruits etc. The book of Leviticus was a continuation of Moses “lawgiving” in Genesis and Exodus. Detailed laws concerning sacrifice, offerings, consecration and priesthood, building of the tabernacle, and worship were included in the book. Even though the Book of Numbers centred primarily on the two great numberings (censuses) of the children of Israel, it also prescribes various laws for Israel (in Chapters 6, 15, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35 and 36). In Deuteronomy, Moses repeats the Ten Commandments (Chapter 5) and includes many new laws. And of course Christ himself reminds us in the New Testament (Mathew 5: 17-18) that he came not to abolish, but to fulfil the law.
The thesis I have been trying to demonstrate above must now be apparent-that God is the source and foundation of all law!
Biblical Influences on Contemporary Law
Beyond these fundamental foundations, we see the influence of the Bible all over the development of legal principles even till contemporary times. The laws relating to incest (Leviticus 18: 6-18); Homosexuality (Leviticus 18: 22); Bestiality (Leviticus 18: 23); Stealing, False Testimony and Obtaining by False Pretences-“419”(Leviticus 19: 11); False Oaths (Leviticus 19: 12); Labour Laws and Fraud (Leviticus 19: 13); Fair Hearing (Leviticus 19: 29); Prostitution (Leviticus 19: 29); Imposing Various Punishments (Leviticus 20); Equality before the Law (Leviticus 24: 22) and Judicial Retribution (Leviticus 24: 20).
We see the beginnings of the institution of the Judiciary in Exodus 18; 13 when Moses “sat to judge the people…” and 18: 14-26 when upon the advice of Jethro, his father-in-law, he “…chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people, …And they judged the people at all seasons: the hard causes they brought unto Moses…”, (in effect Moses was the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court), “…but every small matter they judged themselves…” (while the others were Magistrate and High Courts). See also Deuteronomy 16: 18 (“Judges and officers shalt thou make in all thy gates, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment”) and 17: 8-11. We also see the articulation of judicial principles which remain till today in Deuteronomy 16: 19-20, “Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. That which is altogether just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.” Every thing a modern day judge needs to know about fair hearing, perverting justice, judicial corruption, independence and fairness of the judiciary and judicial impartiality is contained in those verses.
In the book of Exodus we see other influences on the development of the laws of Tort/Negligence (21: 33-36 and 22: 6); Rape (22: 16-17); Sedition/Treason/Anarchy (22: 28) and Bribery (23: 18). In Deuteronomy, we see the origins of laws on the criminal burden of proof and corroboration in evidence (17: 6-7-“On the evidence of two or three witnesses he who is worthy of death shall be put to death; he shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness…”)
Again the thesis developed here must now be compelling-modern laws, legal and judicial principles and court systems have their roots in the laws of God, and their development has been overwhelmingly shaped by Christian doctrine.
Fundamental Human Rights in Nigeria
Chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria contains the fundamental human rights provisions that operate in Nigerian law. The fact that human rights are embedded in our supreme law, the Constitution means as proclaimed in Section 1 (1) that those provisions “…shall have binding force on all authorities and persons throughout the Federal Republic of Nigeria” and as stated in Section 1 (3), “if any other law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, this Constitution shall prevail, and that other law shall to the extent of the inconsistency be void”
The rights enshrined in our laws are outlined from Section 33:-
• Section 33-Right to Life
• Section 34-Dignity of the Human Person; Prohibition of Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment; Prohibition of Slavery or Servitude; Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labour
• Section 35-Right to Personal Liberty
• Section 36-Right to Fair Hearing
• Section 37-Right to Private and Family Life
• Section 38-Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion
• Section 39-Freedom of Expression
• Section 40-Right to Peaceful Assembly and Association
• Section 41-Freedom of Movement
• Section 42-Freedom from Discrimination on Grounds of Community, Ethnic Group, Place of Origin, Religion or Political Opinion
• Section 43-Right to Property
• Section 44-Protection against Compulsory Acquisition of Property without Compensation
What is the source or basis of these provisions? Given all that I have said to this point, it will not surprise you that in my view the notion that a man is created with some fundamental rights, freedoms and protections emanate from the fact of his creation by God, and in the image of God.
See Genesis 1: 26-30, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created created he him; male and female created he them….”
And Genesis 9: 6, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”
In John 10: 10 Christ himself proclaimed, “…I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”
In my view, whether the modern jurist recognises it or not, and irrespective of his acceptance or otherwise, or in spite of his (now secular) high learning and sophistication, these are the most fundamental origins of the notion that man, as man is entitled to some inalienable human rights. That is why Thomas Jefferson declared in the American Declaration of Independence that, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” famously quoted by Martin Luther King Jnr. John Locke also said in “Two Treatises of Civil Government” that “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of laws, where there is no law, there is no freedom”. The American State and its Constitution was without doubt founded upon assumptions about the divine source of laws and the American Currency not surprisingly declares, “In God We Trust”.
Perversion of Human Rights and Justice
If you accept the view that laws and human rights are founded in God’s law, then you will shudder at the perversion and destruction of these foundations and the deployment of legal principles against the ways of God that increasingly characterises modern societies. Some examples will suffice:-
• In Nigeria, persons accused of corruption have deployed fundamental human rights provisions and the protections of our laws and Constitution to avoid, delay and frustrate their prosecution under the law
• Those individuals accused of unleashing terror on and indeed killing some of their fellow men (Alex Ibru, Abraham Adesanya, Kudirat Abiola etc) have employed the instrumentalities of the legal system to avoid and delay justice
• The poor are oppressed by the police and the state, and by powerful individuals and the rich and powerful are in Nigeria essentially above the law
• In Western societies, the most important “human rights” today are the following:-
o Gay Rights-advancing and protecting homosexuality which the Bible calls Sodomy and God explicitly condemns
o Animal Rights-which may one day evolve into justifying bestiality, which God also condemns
o Environmental Protection-which is okay, but which is in danger of making man subject to the environment rather than the other way round (contrary to Genesis 2: 28)
o Same-Sex Marriages-In most Western societies, the trend is towards recognition of marriages or so-called civil unions between people of the same sex
o Gay Adoption Rights-the right of “gay” couples to adopt children
o Abortion Rights-the “Pro-Choice” argument that women can choose to terminate pregnancies at their own will
o Gun Rights-the right of men to bear arms (leading to mass killings and massacres)
• Indeed there is an increasing trend of reverse discrimination-a contestant in a US beauty contest was not selected as winner because she expressed the view that a marriage is a union of a man and woman; a nominee for the post of EU Commissioner was dropped because of his anti-gay views; many in the liberal wing of US politics opposed President Barack Obama’s choice of Pastor Rick Warren, of Saddleback Church and author of the popular, “The Purpose-Driven Life” to give the opening prayer at his inauguration because of his preaching against homosexuality. Today homosexuality is no longer on the defence, but on an aggressive offensive against “homophobia”
• In the Anglican Church, the Church is split on the issue of ordination of openly-homosexual persons as ministers
• In the US, prayer in public schools is illegal and often in many western societies, persons who express religious views are viewed almost in a manner similar to how we perceive insanity
• In California, arguments are now being made for the legalisation of marijuana, because the income that may be generated there from will help in balancing the state’s budget! Indeed my favourite news magazine “The Economist” recently argued in effect in favour of legalising drugs because it is cheaper so to do!! The Transaction-Cost Theory of economics is now applied to justify legalising drugs, prostitution, abortion and even assisted-suicide and euthanasia!!!
The law has lost or is losing its link with its source and foundation-God-and now becoming solely a technical, utilitarian and amoral code of conduct for regulating the affairs of men. Increasingly the law indeed goes beyond being amoral and often times looks positively immoral! Alas, the recent global financial crisis should remind us of the consequences when men act only on the basis of raw passions, in that case greed, recklessness and materialism of US and other Western bankers almost destroyed the global economy. One may add that the recent removal of the CEOs and Executive Directors of five of our banks also demonstrates the same point.
Christianity and Society
What is, or what should be the role of the Church in society? Mathew 5: 13 says, “Ye are the salt of the earth…” and Mathew 5:14-16 says, “Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven”. These scriptures are unambiguous. The Church as a body and individual believers are supposed to provide light in a world overcome by evil and dark behaviours. They are supposed to be the example for others, role models of propriety and righteousness. Where they are sanctioning banks or bankers, the world is supposed to notice that Christians are absent from the list. When corporate governance failures and scandals occur in publicly quoted companies, people should note that Christians CEOs and Directors behave differently. The electorate should be able to observe a difference between the behaviour of elected public office holders who profess the Christian faith and their non-Christian counterparts. University undergraduates should be comfortable that Christian lecturers do not engage in “sorting” or other malpractices that occur in our tertiary institutions. Christian lawyers, engineers, civil servants, teachers, doctors should be different. Pastors should be different! Is this our experience today? That is not my experience!
The Bible says in Mathew 6: 19-20 that we should “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also”. I dare say many of us find it difficult or perhaps impossible to believe this scripture. I do not think the Lord counsels poverty and want. He simply cares about what our fundamental priorities are, and where we will draw the line if we had to choose between heaven and earth. Again Romans 12: 2 urges us all, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God”. Finally as we all know, Mathew 7: 20 tells us that it is by our fruits that we shall be known.
Can we say like the early Church that the fruit of the contemporary Church is Love? Unity? Power? (Mathew 5: 43-46; Acts 1: 14; Acts 2: 1; Acts 4: 32-33) Are we good Samaritans? (Luke 10: 25-37) Are we like Christ, driven by compassion for the world and for our neighbours? (Mark 1: 41; Mark 6: 34; Mark 8: 2-3). Are we agents of societal transformation like the Puritans, Quakers and post-Protestant Reformation Christians transformed European values and conduct (e.g. the so-called Protestant Work Ethic), a transformation which arguably made the Industrial Revolution possible? Why is the Nigerian Church scarcely engaged with the major challenges of our nation-corruption, electoral malpractices, crime and violence, unaccountable leaders, poverty, oppression, insecurity, social injustice and abusive use of power? Why have these and other social issues not been at the top of the agenda of the contemporary Nigerian Church? Jesus Christ himself spoke out especially on behalf of the poor or weak, those who mourn, the meek, the sick, all those who labour and are heavy laden, widows, the lame, blind etc and he railed against oppression. Why are our Churches not having any significant impact on societal vices and values?
Conclusion
The Church must rediscover its essence. As our Lord Jesus Christ warns, “…but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.” (Mathew 5: 13) God forbid that this be the fate of the body of Christ or of any of us! Amen. Happily I can say of this assembly, from the little I have known and heard about you, that you are seeking to impact your society as our Lord commands. This programme is tangible evidence of that impact.
I wish you well and pray that the Lord will bless and multiply your efforts and continue to shine his light upon all of us. Amen.
Opeyemi Agbaje
Lagos, Nigeria.
2009
The Priests of Jeroboam
Solomon’s Kingdom was “outwardly rich, prosperous, and thriving… ” (quoting from the Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary, p.649), “But the great building projects he undertook were accomplished by forced labour, high taxes, and other oppressive measures. When the great king died, the kingdom was like a powder keg awaiting a spark”. Before Solomon’s death, the prophet, Ahijah had prophesied to Jeroboam who was Solomon’s servant (1 Kings 11: 28) that God was going to tear the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon into twelve pieces and would give Jeroboam ten of those pieces. Unfortunately Solomon’s successor, the unwise Rehoboam provided the final straw, listening to the advice of his inexperienced companions and declaring to the Isrealite delegation led by Jeroboam, “Whereas my father laid a heavy yoke on you, I will add to your yoke…” The consequence was the cry, “to your tents O Israel” and thus was Jeroboam, the servant made king over ten tribes of Israel.
But Jeroboam, like the servant that he truly was, feared for the safety and security of his new status as king. He feared that for as long as Israel went to worship at the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, they would experience nostalgia for the Kingdom of the House of David. So for reasons of strategy, and not faith he had to create a new religion for Israel! He turned to idolatry and made two calves of gold, putting one in Bethel and the other in Dan, for Israel to worship. This action was inspired by Jeroboam’s own desire for self-preservation and clearly contrary to the explicit commandments of God and his covenant with Israel. Jeroboam went beyond this initial error. He “made an house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi” (1 Kings 12: 31-33), again clearly for reasons of self and regime viability rather than service to God. In spite of several warnings, Jeroboam continued in his destructive path. He continued to make priests of the lowest of the people and consecrated any willing person as priests of the high places (1 Kings 13: 33) and according to the Bible, “this thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam, even to cut it off, and to destroy it from off the face of the earth”.
Jeroboam was succeeded by his son Nadab, who continued in his father’s errors and not long thereafter, Baasha killed all the House of Jeroboam fulfilling the prophesy. Baasha was succeeded by his son Elah. Elah in turn was killed by his servant Zimri, but the people turned against Zimri and sided with Omri who prevailed against Zimri. Omri was succeeded by his son, Ahab, the husband of Jezebel, in the time of Elijah, the Tishbite. Ahab did worse than all those who reigned before him, (“And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the Lord above all that were before him”-1 Kings 16: 30) and not only did he walk in the path trodden by Jeroboam, but he escalated the defiance of God by Israel’s Kings, and “Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him” and elevated the worship of Baal (a fertility and nature god of the Canaanites and Phoenicians) to a state religion in Israel.
Indeed by the time of Ahab, it was recorded that there was only one prophet of God left-Elijah while the prophets of Baal were abundant in their multitude. In the words of Elijah himself, “I even I only remain a prophet of the Lord; but Baal’s prophets are four hundred and fifty men” (1 Kings 18: 22). I have previously wondered about an incongruity here. We know what became of Jeroboam-after his death, his son and successor, Nadab along with his entire genealogy was wiped out as decreed by the Lord. But what happened to the priests whom Jeroboam ordained carelessly and recklessly all over Israel, thus provoking the Lord to anger? Fittingly the Bible does not speak explicitly about them after Jeroboam, but the revelation is there for the wise. In the time of Jeroboam and perhaps for some while thereafter, those false priests may have continued to pretend to be ministers of the Lord God of Israel, but by the time of Ahab, they had all shed all pretences and were now prophets of Baal! Thus Elijah was the only prophet of God left in Israel!!!
Now we know what became of the priests of Jeroboam-they became prophets of Baal. And we know what became of the prophets of Baal. Though their numbers were many, they were destroyed at the confrontation with Elijah. When all the people saw the fire of the Lord consume Elijah’s sacrifice, they fell on their faces and acknowledged “The Lord, he is the God; the Lord, he is the God” restoring the true worship of God in Israel and putting the plans of men to shame. And all the prophets of Baal were slain at the brook, Kishon. Have a good Christmas!
But Jeroboam, like the servant that he truly was, feared for the safety and security of his new status as king. He feared that for as long as Israel went to worship at the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, they would experience nostalgia for the Kingdom of the House of David. So for reasons of strategy, and not faith he had to create a new religion for Israel! He turned to idolatry and made two calves of gold, putting one in Bethel and the other in Dan, for Israel to worship. This action was inspired by Jeroboam’s own desire for self-preservation and clearly contrary to the explicit commandments of God and his covenant with Israel. Jeroboam went beyond this initial error. He “made an house of high places, and made priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the sons of Levi” (1 Kings 12: 31-33), again clearly for reasons of self and regime viability rather than service to God. In spite of several warnings, Jeroboam continued in his destructive path. He continued to make priests of the lowest of the people and consecrated any willing person as priests of the high places (1 Kings 13: 33) and according to the Bible, “this thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam, even to cut it off, and to destroy it from off the face of the earth”.
Jeroboam was succeeded by his son Nadab, who continued in his father’s errors and not long thereafter, Baasha killed all the House of Jeroboam fulfilling the prophesy. Baasha was succeeded by his son Elah. Elah in turn was killed by his servant Zimri, but the people turned against Zimri and sided with Omri who prevailed against Zimri. Omri was succeeded by his son, Ahab, the husband of Jezebel, in the time of Elijah, the Tishbite. Ahab did worse than all those who reigned before him, (“And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the Lord above all that were before him”-1 Kings 16: 30) and not only did he walk in the path trodden by Jeroboam, but he escalated the defiance of God by Israel’s Kings, and “Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him” and elevated the worship of Baal (a fertility and nature god of the Canaanites and Phoenicians) to a state religion in Israel.
Indeed by the time of Ahab, it was recorded that there was only one prophet of God left-Elijah while the prophets of Baal were abundant in their multitude. In the words of Elijah himself, “I even I only remain a prophet of the Lord; but Baal’s prophets are four hundred and fifty men” (1 Kings 18: 22). I have previously wondered about an incongruity here. We know what became of Jeroboam-after his death, his son and successor, Nadab along with his entire genealogy was wiped out as decreed by the Lord. But what happened to the priests whom Jeroboam ordained carelessly and recklessly all over Israel, thus provoking the Lord to anger? Fittingly the Bible does not speak explicitly about them after Jeroboam, but the revelation is there for the wise. In the time of Jeroboam and perhaps for some while thereafter, those false priests may have continued to pretend to be ministers of the Lord God of Israel, but by the time of Ahab, they had all shed all pretences and were now prophets of Baal! Thus Elijah was the only prophet of God left in Israel!!!
Now we know what became of the priests of Jeroboam-they became prophets of Baal. And we know what became of the prophets of Baal. Though their numbers were many, they were destroyed at the confrontation with Elijah. When all the people saw the fire of the Lord consume Elijah’s sacrifice, they fell on their faces and acknowledged “The Lord, he is the God; the Lord, he is the God” restoring the true worship of God in Israel and putting the plans of men to shame. And all the prophets of Baal were slain at the brook, Kishon. Have a good Christmas!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
